Peer assessment activity on draft of collaborative project: some reflections

In this activity of P2P assessment I have found more useful the suggests of my colleagues.

I think it’s positive when some tips are given sincerely  and it is therefore important that we are not disappointed for this. Especially considering that in this week we must produce only a draft of our projects, and so necessarily to review.

It seems that my project should be strengthened in the part of evaluation. In fact in my project’s draft  outcomes are described but there is no indication of how the outcomes will be assessed and evaluated. Effectively I thought I would come back to evaluation at a later stage. 

It is important, by contrast, that an evaluation plan is identified during the planning phase of the proposal and not added to the proposal as an after-thought, given that it identifies the assessments and the formative and summative evaluations that are germane to the key evaluative components of the project. And so I’m reflecting on a rubric that takes into account:

Ø      Pedagogical innovation and creativity

Ø      Curricular integration

Ø      Collaboration among partners schools

Ø      Use of technology

Ø      Continuity

Ø      Results and benefits

I think also that evaluation is necessary as for students as for teachers. To that end, it could therefore be established to create some visitors (other teachers or students’ parents).

In addition, I myself think that I must add some other aspects not adequately considered up to now, for example something about the use of different languages and  the choice of partners schools.